Why is blitz rated r




















Add your rating See all 3 kid reviews. Marred by inconsistent gameplay, bugs which announce things in the game incorrectly, and even game-crashing glitches, this is a title which seems like it may have been rushed out. The core game of Blitz II is a campaign mode which follows a young superstar through his career.

Starting out in the lowest league, you must fight your way to the top and win the Division One title. Three separate divisions are here to be conquered, each naturally a little tougher than the previous. But the game's artificial intelligence is broken, and if you find yourself easily beating a computer opponent, do not be surprised to see your team start to fumble the ball more often, or give up interceptions to the computer.

The fact that this game emphasizes excess in all aspects does nothing to enhance the gameplay, rather, it makes it become even more tedious and painful to play. Seeing a bone shatter once or twice is somewhat interesting, but forcing you to see it multiple times within a game and then having to perform the same mini-game to attempt and heal the player, becomes boring very quickly. Rather than emphasize actually football gameplay, Blitz 2 unfortunately has put the violent aspect as the foreground in the game.

This combined with the buggy gameplay really take the enjoyment out of the title. Families can talk about sports including topics about sportsmanship and why some athletes take illegal performance-enhancing drugs.

Why do some sports appear to have a problem with drug abuse while others do not? Families can also talk about the portrayal of women in this title: is it OK for the only women in this title to be shown in skimpy clothing? Why do you think that the game creators opted to do this? Common Sense Media's unbiased ratings are created by expert reviewers and aren't influenced by the product's creators or by any of our funders, affiliates, or partners. See how we rate.

Common Sense Media, a nonprofit organization, earns a small affiliate fee from Amazon or iTunes when you use our links to make a purchase. Thank you for your support. Our ratings are based on child development best practices.

We display the minimum age for which content is developmentally appropriate. The star rating reflects overall quality and learning potential. Learn how we rate.

Parents' Ultimate Guide to Support our work! Corona Column 3 Use these free activities to help kids explore our planet, learn about global challenges, think of solutions, and take action. Blitz the League II.

Bloody extreme football than can be skipped. Rate game. Play or buy. Based on 1 review. Based on 3 reviews. Get it now Searching for streaming and purchasing options Common Sense is a nonprofit organization.

Your purchase helps us remain independent and ad-free. We are here to assist you and your team as you manage your event in this unprecedented business environment. Play quizzes, win prizes! This short film explains rationing in simple terms, offering a glimpse of a world that pupils may not be accustomed to. Be assured that our IT systems are robust and you should experience only minimal disruptions in the service we provide to you.

Plot Summary [6], David Hughes of Empire gave the film 3 out of 5 and wrote: "A rough-cut crime thriller that sees Jason Statham back on familiar turf and doing what he does best. And until then, ordinary people across Britain just had to hold on.

There is a reference to and later seen through security footage a man brutally beating another man. The objective of these events is to first mate two distinct Dragons, or Dragons with certain Elements, in order to obtain a particular limited Dragon.

It was like bricks on the wall, it wasn't a wall, a plastered wall. At 1 hour 6 minutes 15 seconds, for 3 seconds breasts are visible in the background, as the main characters pass through a house of prostitutes. Some violent scenes throughout, although not particularly graphic. Blood splatters all over the policeman and the car. Narrator: Did you know?

Most of these were children separated from their parents. A tough cop is dispatched to take down a serial killer who has been targeting police officers.

The violent scenes are numerous, but usually not extremely graphic. In fact, the only nod to a single player mode here comes courtesy of the "goals" system, which, as an example, asks you to earn 3 stars on a Rock song, or get 12 stars across any alternative tunes - but the goals aren't actually accessible in game.

Narrator: But even if the evacuations were upsetting, at least it was safer than being in the cities. We see blood splattering on the killer's face, and later we see the bloody corpse. All Reviews for Blitz Burgers - of Reviews. In-Game Overlays. There's only one way to find out! Sadly, there's no family friendly mode like in Rock Band 3, which automatically filtered out any songs that had any questionable lyrics - so it's up to parents to go through manually and decide what is and isn't suitable.

Surprised by a hidden Brant, Weiss is mercilessly beaten, overpowered and relieved of his gun. It's cop-killer versus killer-cop. Rated R for strong brutal violence, language, some drug use and nudity. Did you know Edit. Trivia The screenplay for this film was featured in the Blacklist; a list of the "most liked" unmade scripts of the year. When the camera changes to a long shot shortly after he fires, Brant can be seen holding a silver revolver. Quotes Brant : A word of advice, girls.

User reviews Review. Top review. Solid but lacks real impact and benefits greatly from the stars involved. Brant is a no nonsense copper. Frequently in trouble for violent conduct, he drinks hard, smokes where he likes and can't operate a computer and sees typing to be like cooking — women's work. He is pretty much on his last chance whenever someone start killing police officers. The killers calls himself Blitz and informs a journalist that he intends to kill 8 more officers; meanwhile Brant joins his boss Nash to try and catch the killer before he strikes again.

Bit of an odd film this; it sort of does enough to be entertaining but at the same time it seems to want to pull in a direction that doesn't really fit the material, while also rather fudging the darker drama that it also could have been.

The end result is a bit of a muddle but it is solid enough to get by. The film starts with Brant taking on some yobs and then is followed by a scene of him being tough in the face of the department doctor — so far, so much to be expected.

Unfortunately for the film, the rest of the plot doesn't really lend itself to this sort of cop — he feels like he would be more at home in more of an action movie. So when Brant is around the film is a little bit cheeky and a little bit tough, but otherwise it keeps taking odd paths. So for example the entire thread with Falls seems wasted — her drug use, her relationship, none of it seems to fit into the rest of the film.

This rather muddled feel also leads to the film not quite delivering in any specific way. It feels like it should be a tough-talking action movie, but yet it never becomes one. It feels like there are character-driven aspects to be had, but yet you never get to the heart of anything. It sort of does a bit of all of this well enough to get by — but this is what it is doing, getting by. The actors help it greatly, even if their presence may also have guiding the film down certain roads.

I think this specifically about Statham who is a strength to the film while also being a possible factor for the confused approach. He does "Stratham" and does it well and kudos for a guy getting Hollywood money to be coming back to the UK to make movies. He is a real presence in the film but too much of it seems geared towards his performance when it should have gone other ways — he is still good, but he should have gone with the film, not the other way around.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000